ARS
Meeting in Yemen, and the Future of Somalia
|
Posted
on Qaranimo Online - July 04, 2008
|
|
Dr. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
July 03, 2008
|
Friday,
July
04, 2008 -
Another opportunity to constructively
engage in the path of Somalia´s
pacification,
reunification and rehabilitation is offered to
all factions of the Alliance for the
Re-liberation of Somalia thanks the Yemenite
initiative and the invitation of the wings of
ARS to Sanaa for deliberations and
consultations.
ARS has a brief history, but encapsulates the
longest and the most fervent hopes of the
outright majority of the Somalis as regards an
augur and propitious, prosperous and serene
Somalia. It is only normal that not all the
members of this wide political range
constellation see developments – and more
particularly the recently signed Djibouti
Agreement – in the absolutely same way.
Even there is no need for this; a rich political
environment featuring a variety of opinions and
approaches only underscores Somalia´s opulent
historical record and magnificent contribution
to African and Islamic History. But, within this
context, one must specify the limits of the
Somali opposition´s political landscape. These
are fixed by the following points:
The Limits of the Somali Opposition´s Political
Landscape
Point 1. Majority decisions do not eradicate the
minority´s approach to an issue, in a true
democracy; they only compose with that tenant.
This is true for every democratic country, and
we know very well how many times European and
American administrations (conventionally and at
times erratically considered as authentically
democratic) acted overwhelmingly against the
opinion of the minority, being thus led to
political impasse. Somalia´s modern history
shows that this is not an option in Somalia
either.
Point 2. Minority has to respect the majority
decision, and as it happens allover the world,
after the acceptance of the fact that an
opposite idea is accepted by the majority, the
minority starts efforts to limit the
consequences of the decision, gradually modify
it, and ultimately advance their approach.
Point 3. To effectively act in the
aforementioned way, the minority must stay ´in´.
If the political institution (party, movement,
organization or alliance) is finally divided,
the minority hands are certainly free but their
political impact is dramatically limited.
Point 4. Procedures must be transparent, member
trust and mutual solidarity should be top
priority, and the right titles and authority of
every ARS official and representative should be
clearly spelled out.
A Plan for Somalia´s Reconstruction, and Basics
of Somali Foreign Policy
The two factions of ARS should consider their
plan for Somalia´s liberation, pacification,
reunification and rehabilitation, while at the
same time they must detect, analyze and assess
various foreign plans that go in the opposite
direction as theirs.
An effort to shape a basic approach to what the
foreign policy of Somalia should be will also
help ARS members come closer, divide tasks, and
identify targets for every one.
The positive consequence of the Djibouti
Agreement is that by now ARS is already an
internationally accredited Somali political
organization, and this enables contacts of
international character.
This consists in an excellent opportunity for
any faction of ARS to publicize their approach
and gain support in view of the gigantic task of
Somalia´s pacification and reconstruction.
Perception of Threats
Due to Somalia´s recent past, Somalia´s
foreign policy must be first a clear perception
of existing threats and related intentions. Even
if the Abyssinian soldiers leave at the end of
the specified period of 120 days, as stated in
the Djibouti Agreement, this does not signify
that Abyssinia´s evil plans vanished and
anti-Somali intentions disappeared.
In addition, it would be infantile to imagine
that the traditional colonial plans of England
and the US, which are responsible for Somalia´s
long lasted Civil War, evaporated because of the
brave fight of the Shebab.
Abyssinia certainly cannot afford to continue
fighting in Somalia; Abyssinia is not a big
nation. It is an appalling tyranny made out of a
vertical ethno-religious divide between the
ruling Monophysitic Amhara and Tigray
Abyssinians (who total ca. 18% of the country´s
population) and all the rest, the tyrannized
nations and oppressed religious minorities
(82%). The thugs sent to Somalia, impersonating
soldiers of a supposed ´national´ army, are in
their quasi-totality Monophysitic Amhara and
Tigray Abyssinians (ca. 15 million people). They
cannot afford to receive so many coffins back
home in Gonder or Mekele.
This means that the colonial supporters and
allies of Abyssinia, the English and the
pro-English part of the American establishment (Jendayi
Frazer being one of their typical
representatives) will have now an interest to
terminate the Somalia quagmire and save their
ailing ally.
It would be over-simplistic to imagine that you
will make them fail, by denying them the process
and fighting until an irreversible victory in
the battlefield, which will not come. In
politics, synergy is the choice, whereas the
waste of one´s resources cannot possibly be an
option. Certainly, Somalia owns millions of
brave young men who are ready to die for the
liberation of their country, but is it not a
case of political immorality, opportunism and
irrelevance, if the Somali political leadership
can bring forth a political solution, but
instead, they don´t proceed so, and in this way
they let the Somali Youth die?
The lowest national cost, the lowest degree of
wasting resources, the greatest economy for
Somalia´s foremost wealth, namely the Somali
Youth, must be option no 1 for all factions of
the political establishment of ARS.
In addition, if the US – UK diplomacy and
administrations want to give peace a chance now,
this does not mean that they imply they would
accept (let alone contribute to) the formation
of a great, independent, reunited, rehabilitated
and prosperous Somalia. The patriotic forces of
Somalia will have to anticipate biases,
machinations, and malignant plotting in the
process.
However, denying to get engaged in the process
simply reveals political weakness, fear and
simplistic mindset; these are not qualifications
allowing leaders to save their countries.
Certainly, no one has to be born as another
Machiavelli or Talleyrand but in this case,
he/she should leave space to others who better
qualify for the job.
Ion fact, there cannot be any doubt about the US
– UK persistence in
a) preserving Abyssinia´s integrity,
b) minimizing the extent of China´s and Italy´s
involvement in Somalia, and
c) eternalizing Somalia´s division – in
peace.
Another threat is the US – UK willingness to
use ARS in a way to finally help TFG to survive,
the Abyssinian army to leave Somalia, and a
shaky provisory government of national unity to
be formed, until the rich, US-based Somali
Diaspora pumps money in the pre-electoral period
to help Sheikh Sharif … lose the elections.
But again this does not consist in a reason for
fear; counter-measures exist at the political
level, and the world is full of influential
administrations and centers of power that would
do their ingenious best to contribute to the US
– UK plan´s failure.
All together!
In fact, if we assume that, following the use of
conventional colonial trickeries (an
amalgamation of money, flatter and promises)
made by US and UK, one faction of the ARS may
fall victim of the plot, we have to conclude
that there is more than one reason for the other
faction to stay united with the first in order
to
1) minimize damages,
2) contain his decisions´ impact, and
3) better identify the true purposes (as per
point) of Somalia´s enemies.
What better political tools can there be, other
than presence, attendance, consultation,
deliberation, negotiation and (in every point)
mutual political compromise, to help minimize
the extent of any scheming?
Old colonial
trickery and machinations
In the development of political situations, there
are always points ´offered´ by the enemy. The US
– UK diplomats knew beforehand that, by
supporting the signature of an agreement between
TFG and ARS in Djibouti, they give the Somali
oposition a tool, a weapon, a key, namely the
aforementioned ´success´, the status of the
internationally recognized interlocutor.
This was a risk they took; to limit its effect,
they counted on two points:
1. Containing Sheikh Sharif and Sharif Hassan Aden
through personal contacts and beforehand
compromises (of the sort ´I will do this, but you
will not do that or you will not speak with these
guys´) and
2. Isolating and marginalizing all those around
Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys and Dr. Zakaria Haji
Abdi (as they expect them to react to Sheikh
Sharif and Sharif Hassan Aden, and get
marginalized by themselves – tactics called
Prisoner´s Dilemma).
How to Outmaneuver the Colonial, US – UK plans
and trickery
The most cost-effective way to face a great power
(and/or a superpower) is not a frontal attack; it
is the introduction of new players into the game
– per case. These other factors that would be of
greater help are those who are the right enemies
of Somalia´s enemies; here I don´t need to refer
to Abyssinia.
Certainly, the concept of a balanced cooperation
between Eritrea and Somalia, and at the present
stage between the Eritrean administration and the
Somali opposition is not bad in itself, but the
limits of help extended by Eritrea to the Somali
opposition are ostensible. Eritrea can ensure mere
survival and daily fight against the lawless
Abyssinian invaders of Somalia. The Somali
opposition definitely needs more.
In addition, Abyssinia may be a traditional enemy
of Somalia, but the equally starving and
impoverished country fails to be the top threat
for Somalia.
Somalia´s foremost enemies are the following: UK,
France and USA. However, one should not consider
the entire American establishment as enemy of
Somalia; its pro-English part is – only.
Certainly, that part prevails in America (they
sided with England against Argentina in the
Falklands War), but America´s anti-English part
is not weak whatsoever. All ARS factions should
therefore restrain from frontally attacking
America; instead, they should open some channels
to the ´other´ part of the American
establishment; Obama seems to be one of them.
Which country´s influence in Somalia do UK and
France want to eliminate? This is the top question
that leads to the key answer as regards the Somali
foreign policy. The answer is easy and obvious; it´s
the country that helped Somalia draft its
constitution in the early 60s. That constitution
was not too bad after all; it could work, but
efforts were made against it, mostly by the
English.
Italy and Vatican
It sounds as an absurdity, but it is true indeed;
nowadays, the country that could help Somalia most
is the old colonial power, Italy. Today´s Italy
is not Mussolini´s Italy. As genuinely
anti-colonial country, Italy recently returned a
historical stele (´hawalti´ in Tigrinya) taken
and transported to Rome in the 1930s from Aksum.
Contrarily to Italy´s present anti-colonial
stance, a great number of Ancient Egyptian
obelisks still decorate squares in colonial
France, England, and America….
The real power behind Italy is Vatican and the
resources it controls in Europe, Northern America,
and mostly Latin America. Vatican is not
necessarily a realm of innocent and benevolent
people, and they have had throughout History an
incredible record of intolerance against Jews,
Eastern Christians (Orthodox, Monophysitic {Tewahedo
in Ge´ez} and Nestorian) and Muslims (not to
mention the butchery of the anti-Catholic
Europeans during the Middle Ages, and the
slaughtering of Pre-Colombian Americans, the
Mayas, the Aztecs and the Incas at the times of
the Discovery of America).
However, post-World War II Vatican has been an
embattled institution, due to the Freemasonic –
Zionist aggression against them at all levels,
political, economic, cultural, academic,
intellectual.
In our world, whereby the anti-Islamic hatred and
hysteria of the Freemasonic – Zionist
establishment goes beyond imagination, Vatican and
Italy (and their associates in the US, other
European countries and Latin America) can be of
valuable help and possible partners for Muslims
eager to find partners in a search for moral
values, human principles, and ethics.
Part of the Italian establishment (particularly
circles close to Premier Berlusconi and Senator
Giulio Andreotti – shamefully and undeservedly
slandered by English and French Freemasonic mass
media) would be very content to encounter some
Somali interlocutors and deal with them for the
pacification and reconstruction of Somalia. Italy
and Vatican can mobilize unexpected partners and
contributors to Somalia´s re-unification,
pacification and rehabilitation.
Turkey, Japan,
Poland, Malaysia, Taiwan, Venezuela
Other players could involve Turkey (mostly the
military establishment – the Erdogan government
is all full of Anglo-French puppets), Japan,
Poland (drastically anti-French), Malaysia,
Taiwan, Venezuela, Mexico, Argentina, and to
lesser extent India, Iran, Brazil and Ireland.
Finally, I doubt whether Russia and China,
establishments accustomed to quantitative
approaches (most erroneously for their own
interests), could ever be of help, as their
perception of Africa leaves intact the
cornerstones of the Anglo-French colonialism.
These thoughts are simply describing the vast
possibilities existing for all factions of ARS to
get engaged in the struggle for taking Somalia out
of the strife and the despair.
Frontal ´No´ proved to fail in Somalia; all
Somalis know this – only too well.
Now, it´s the time for Nuanced ´Yes´.
I am sure the leaders and the members of ARS can
see this in the eyes of all their compatriots.
They only thing they have to do is just look at
them.
I republish here recent reports and news selected
from various Somali and Oromo portals. At the end,
I add a meaningful feature published by an astute
Somali commentator, Mr. Abdinasir Mohamed Guled,
on some comments expressed by the American
ambassador as regards Abyssinia´s role in Somalia
(supposedly positive!). It shows very well that
the US support for a sort of peace in Somalia does
not imply a change of attitude toward Abyssinia;
for the time being.
However, through correct contacts and adequate
lobbying, it can change in the future; not a
single Somali should view the present US
administration´s stance as permanent.
A delegation from Alliance for Reliberation of
Somalia has arrived in Yemen capital, San'a to
take ARS´s meeting opened in Yemen
http://www.mareeg.com/fidsan.php?sid=6618&tirsan=3
The delegates flew from Djibouti and Asmara.
The delegation from Djibouti is led by Sheikh
Sharif Sheikh Ahmad [leader of the Alliance for
Reliberation of Somalia], but reports say he did
not go directly to the venue of the talks between
the two rival sides.
Yemeni officials say the parliamentary Speaker of
Yemen has called the two sides and asked them to
work together in pacifying Somalia and the
implementation of the peace deal which the
government signed in Djibouti last month.
A positive outcome is expected to come out of the
meeting as officials at the meeting told Mareeg
online.
Reports say Yemen is hopeful that lasting peace
will be restored in Somalia. According to some
reports, there were preliminary talks through
telephone presumably between Yemen officials and
two rival sides within the Somali opposition
alliance.
Sheikh Hasan Dahir Aweys, who is opposed to the
Djibouti peace deal between the Somali government
and the Alliance for Reliberation of Somalia, has
said the deal is against Somalia's interests but
he didn´t rebuff the involvement of the meeting.
He has said he will not attend the talks in Yemen,
but promised to support the outcome.
Somali political analysts have expressed concern
over the refusal of Sheikh Aweys to attend the
talks in Yemen.
Alliance for the Re-liberation Meeting begins in
Djibouti
http://hiiraan.com/news2/2008/July/allinace_for_the_re_liberation_meeting_begins_in_djibouti.aspx
Mogadishu, Somalia (HOL) - The second Annual
General Meeting of the Alliance for the
Re-liberation of Somalia (ARS) has started in
Djibouti this morning although members of the
group still in Eritrea are not participating in
the meeting.
Suleiman Olad Roble who is a member of the
Communications Committee of the ARS told reporters
that over 100 members are participating in the
meeting.
Mr. Roble added that the participants will discuss
issues that include Islam and politics, Somali
civil society as well as other topics. Mr. Roble
added that the formal agenda of the meeting has
been postponed for a week in anticipation of the
arrival of 48 other members the group who will
join the meeting.
The 48 members expected to join the meeting are
headed by the chairman of the ARS are currently in
Yemen to participate in mediation talks between
the two faction of the ARS.
It is also expected that member of the ARS in
Eritrea will hold Annual General Meeting in Asmara,
Eritrea. The meeting is expected to begin on July
3rd and will be chaired by Zakaria Haji Abdi.
2008 Hiiraan Online Inc.
Somali Opposition Factions to Hold Talks in Yemen
By Alisha Ryu, Nairobi
http://www.ayyaantuu.com/Oromiyaa/NewsBlog/tabid/36/EntryID/2626/Default.aspx
Somalia's opposition factions are expected to soon
hold face-to-face talks in Yemen. The opposition
split over the signing of a controversial peace
agreement last month. The talks follow recent
comments by the principle Islamist signatory to
the agreement who said the opposition will unite
against the government if Ethiopian troops do not
leave Somalia within four months. VOA
correspondent Alisha Ryu reports from our East
Africa Bureau in Nairobi.
In a telephone interview from the Somalia
opposition group's base in Asmara, Eritrea,
Islamist cleric Sheik Hassan Dahir Aweys tells VOA
that representatives from his faction and allies
of Sheik Sharif Sheik Ahmed have received
permission from the Yemeni government to hold
direct talks in Sana'a.
Aweys, who is influential among some clan and
radical Islamist insurgents in Somalia, says he is
not planning to attend the meeting. But he says he
is ready to support whatever agreement is reached
between the two sides.
The Islamist leader says the opposition Alliance
for the Re-liberation of Somalia (ARS) requested
the meeting, because there are issues to discuss
and Somalis often resolve differences by talking.
He says everyone is expected to abide by what the
majority decides.
Aweys and other hardliners in the alliance stayed
away from U.N.-sponsored peace talks in Djibouti
that led to the June 9 signing of an agreement
between the more moderate Ahmed and the
transitional federal government.
Opposition hardliners rejected the peace deal.
It stipulates that Ethiopian troops, who have
backed the Somali transitional government since
late 2006, would withdraw within 120 days if a
U.N. stabilization force of sufficient strength is
in place to replace them. Hardliners argue the
agreement should have called for Ethiopians to
withdraw immediately. They have threatened to
remove Ahmed as chairman of the ARS for
participating in the peace process.
U.S.-based Horn of Africa observer and commentator
Professor Michael Weinstein says Ahmed has
recently made comments that suggested he was eager
to prove to Somalis that the opposition alliance
is intact and that a clear timetable for an
Ethiopian withdrawal has been set.
"He said that we are all on the same page in
the ARS. We all want the Ethiopians out. We will
liberate by negotiations, but if that does not
work, we will rejoin the armed resistance and we
are confident that if we liberate by negotiations,
the militant faction of the ARS will join us. So
it is all depending on 120 days, according to
Sheik Sharif," he said.
Weinstein says Ahmed's comments may have helped
soothe some of the anger, allowing an opposition
reconciliation meeting to take place in Yemen. But
he says Ahmed's words are deeply troubling for the
international community, which must now find a way
to quickly deploy a sizeable stabilization force
in Somalia to keep the country from plunging
further into violence.
Fighting between insurgents and Ethiopian and
government troops for the past 18 months has
killed more than 85-hundred people, displaced more
than one million others, and has left Somalia in
the midst of what the United Nations says is the
biggest humanitarian crisis in the world.
Another armed Somali group which boycotted the
talks in Djibouti, the Shabab, has not yet
commented on the peace deal. Its leaders have long
maintained that the Shabab, recently designated as
a terrorist group by the United States for having
ties to al-Qaida, would continue fighting until
all Ethiopians left Somali soil.
Somalia: US envoy describes Ethiopia's role in
Somalia "very positive"
By: Abdinasir Mohamed Guled
http://www.mareeg.com/fidsan.php?sid=6601&tirsan=3
US ambassador to Ethiopia, Donald Yamamoto, says
the United States recognizes Ethiopia's
contribution in various peacekeeping operations in
the region and other areas of conflict in Africa.
"Ethiopia is right now, I think, the second
largest troops contributing country in
peacekeeping operations in Sub-Saharan Africa and
probably has the most disciplined and qualified
troops," Yamamoto said.
Ethiopia has been playing a very positive role in
regional peace and security, Yamamoto said at a
press briefing he gave on Tuesday [1 July] at the
US embassy.
The US government is working closely with Ethiopia
and other countries with a view to helping enhance
peace and security in the Horn of Africa, he said.
According to the ambassador, the US government
looks at the peace and security situation in the
region with due concern.
Yamamoto said the mandate of the Transitional
Federal Government (TFG) in Somalia will expire
and the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) in
Sudan will have to be fully implemented in 2009
and elections are to be held.
"The year
2009 is going to be a watershed, because we are
going to have stability or instability or we are
going to have directions towards regional security
or not," he said.
With regard to Somalia, the United States
appreciates Ethiopia's concerns. For Ethiopia, the
issue in Somalia is particularly the security
issue just as was the stability issue.
"If you don't have stability in Somalia you
never have stability in your borders." He
added.
"On the other hand, it is also a regional
issue, because we can see the influx of foreign
fighters and other extremists coming to
Somalia," he said.
"And these are all concerns that affect not
only Ethiopia but also Kenya, Tanzania, Djibouti
and all the people who live in the region, he
said. "So we need to work together with
Ethiopia and the neighbouring countries to carry
out objectives on how to enhance security,"
he said.
The shaky transitional government invited
Ethiopian forces into the country to help it
battle Islamic insurgents. Somalia has been torn
apart by years of violence between the militias of
rival clan warlords.
The rights group said it had scores of reports of
killings by Ethiopian troops. In one case, "a
young child's throat was slit by Ethiopian
soldiers in front of the child's mother," the
report says.
Amnesty said about 6,000 civilians had been
reported killed and more than 600,000 had been
forced to flee their homes in the Somali capital,
Mogadishu, last year.
"The people of Somalia are being killed,
raped, and tortured. Looting is widespread and
entire neighborhoods are being destroyed,"
Michelle Kagari, the Amnesty deputy director for
Africa, said in a statement from Nairobi that
accompanied the report.
The report quotes testimony from 75 witnesses as
well as scores of workers from nongovernmental
organizations. People are identified only by first
name to protect them from retaliation.
In one testimony, Haboon, 56, said her neighbor's
17-year-old daughter had been raped by Ethiopian
troops. The girl's brothers tried to defend their
sister, but the soldiers beat them and gouged
their eyes out with a bayonet, Haboon was quoted
as telling Amnesty.
"The testimony we received strongly suggests
that war crimes and possibly crimes against
humanity have been committed by all parties to the
conflict in Somalia and no one is being held
accountable," Kagari said.
Somalia has been mired in chaos since 1991, when
warlords overthrew the longtime dictator, Mohamed
Siad Barre, and then turned on each other. Last
year, Islamist militants took control of most of
southern Somalia, including Mogadishu. Troops from
neighboring Ethiopia dewere ployed in December
2006 and ejected the Islamists from the capital.
Since then, Mogadishu has been caught up in a
guerrilla war between the government and its
Ethiopian allies, and the Islamist insurgents.
Amnesty urged the United Nations, the African
Union and other groups to halt the violence.
Note
Picture: Somali leaders have primarily to do one
thing: look at the eyes of the simple, average
Somalis.
Xafiiska Wararka ee Toronto, Canada
Qaranimo Online
info@Qaranimo.com
|
|
|
|
|